Of all the faces to critique, a 20-year-old looksmaxxing streamer reportedly chose Kendall Jenner's, calling the supermodel 'ugly' before trying to fix her on screen. Clavicular's Kendall Jenner stream has since been torn apart online, with commenters suggesting the only face that needed attention was his own.
Braden Peters, who goes by Clavicular online, billed the session a 'science class'. He put a photo of the 30-year-old on a screen and adjusted her jawline and proportions while his audience watched, and the thread's verdict was that the result looked much the same as the start.
Who Is Braden Peters, AKA Clavicular?
Peters is one of the more recognisable faces of looksmaxxing, an online trend fixated on extreme facial aesthetics, from bone structure to strict grooming routines. The premise is that attractiveness is a formula anyone can crack, a message that resonates with young men already anxious about how they look.
Court records show he has been charged in Massachusetts with rape, administering a substance for sexual intercourse, and procuring alcohol for someone under 21, in connection with an alleged incident in May 2025. He is not in custody and faces a scheduled arraignment in Massachusetts. Peters has denied the allegations in a Florida civil lawsuit, and his representative said he has not been physically served in the criminal case.
Clavicular held a science class to fix Kendall Jenner’s face after calling her ugly. Clav used software to change her facial features and show what he thinks would make her look better. pic.twitter.com/8MyG32f3R5
— ClipperViral📎 (@ClipperViralHQ) October 10, 2026
Why Is the Internet Calling It Insecurity?
The thread did not hold back. One commenter wrote, 'He's not even close to as attractive as her lol', while another said, 'Calling Kendall Jenner ugly is certainly a choice.' A third said she looks the same even after the changes, which sums up how little the edits impressed.
He’s not even close to as attractive as her lol 😂
— Luka Tha Don (@lukadisdik) October 10, 2026
The mockery lands because the contrast was stark. Jenner is an internationally recognised fashion figure, while Peters was running a Photoshop tutorial for a live audience. Supporters of looksmaxxing argue that tiny gains are the point, but lessons invisible to the crowd are a hard sell, and many commenters called the whole performance as insecurity on display.
calling kendall jenner ugly is certainly a choicepic.twitter.com/XlETPlyxx5
— mona 🦢 (@Iifesupportbeer) October 11, 2026
Peters has been open about how far he has gone to reshape his appearance. He has publicly discussed a nose job, testosterone replacement therapy, and attempts to cause tiny fractures in his own bones in hopes they would heal stronger. Against that backdrop, a lecture on fixing someone else's face was always likely to draw scepticism.
Is Streaming Like This Harmful for Teens?
Many viewers are young, and the message is hard to miss: even a supermodel's face is a draft waiting for correction. A 2023 study in Frontiers in Psychology found that image-based social media use, and appearance-driven reasons for using it, were positively associated with body dysmorphic symptoms in young people. That shows a link, not proof of cause, but it explains why content that treats the human face as a problem to solve raises concern.
Moderation is also unresolved. Most platforms have rules on harassment and body-shaming, but it is rarely clear whether a stream grading a named public figure's looks breaks them, and enforcement tends to trail the clips.
The real irony was that his own 'science' undercut him. After a whole session of micro-edits his audience could barely spot, Peters did not show that Kendall Jenner needed fixing. He showed how much his corner of the internet depends on finding flaws to sell the cure.
