A picture of US Vice President JD Vance carrying his newborn down the steps of a plane in Alaska was meant to be a feel-good moment. Instead, people online have picked it apart, with parents asking why a father holding his own child counts as news.
Anna Lulis, a conservative activist described as pro-life and a big fan of the vice president, shared the image on X. She said Vance was 'single-handedly humanising fatherhood' and added that children are not burdens but the future. Users on the subreddit r/evilwomeninc countered with a reply that summed up the mood: 'An extraordinary man is just a regular woman.'
Why the JD Vance Photo Hit a Nerve With Parents
The anger centred on the word humanising. Readers found it alarming that fatherhood needed humanising at all, and mothers in the thread described the assumption as painfully familiar, having been asked whether their husbands were 'babysitting' their own children. A supermarket queue became the example of choice: a dad loudly entertaining his toddler while his partner unloaded the trolley, glancing round as if he expected applause.
Comment
by u/tater-tots-r-us from discussion
in evilwomeninc
The argument running through these stories was simple. When ordinary effort earns applause, it suggests men were never expected to make it, while mothers do the same work without comment. The damage also runs the other way, according to women who said praise for the basics leaves mothers feeling inadequate and pushes them to do even more to avoid 'mom-guilt,' which lets fathers do less.
Incredible. Vance arrives in Alaska carrying his newborn baby.
— Anna Lulis (@annamlulis) October 6, 2026
He is single-handedly humanizing fatherhood.
Kids aren’t burdens, they’re the future. pic.twitter.com/X1oxdopv7r
The Double Standard Commenters Called Out
The thread kept returning to a role reversal. Put a woman in the same scene, commenters said, and the verdict changes. The baby needed a hat, the trip was reckless, she was too distracted by her family to do her job. The criticism would arrive whether she worked, stayed at home, or was breastfeeding, and her mere presence with a newborn on a plane would be treated as an imposition on everyone around her, while a man doing the same is hailed as a super dad.
Comment
by u/tater-tots-r-us from discussion
in evilwomeninc
That scrutiny, they argued, is rarely turned on fathers, even when there is something to notice. Several pointed out that the baby looked underdressed for Alaska and not fully supported, a detail they said a mother would never get away with. The humour in the thread had its own punchline: every mum would be a billionaire if she were paid a dollar each time she picked up her child.
Comment
by u/tater-tots-r-us from discussion
in evilwomeninc
Is the Backlash Missing the Point?
Even among those who shared the frustration, there was disagreement about where the blame belonged. The most direct objection was to the caption's premise, since fatherhood has always been human. Praising dads for the basics, others added, patronises hands-on fathers as well and leaves mothers paying for it. The conversation drifted into politics too, with the suggestion that conservatives who call women the better nurturers and children the future should logically back a matriarchy.
Comment
by u/tater-tots-r-us from discussion
in evilwomeninc
Claims that the photo was staged, along with theories about why Vance was holding the baby at all, circulated without any evidence to support them. The photo of JD Vance holding his baby may show an ordinary family moment, but the reaction on r/evilwomeninc shows how quickly a flattering caption can become an argument about who gets praised for parenting and who is simply expected to do it.
